{"id":1439,"date":"2009-11-14T06:09:23","date_gmt":"2009-11-14T13:09:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/envirobeat.com\/?p=1439"},"modified":"2010-11-10T22:15:05","modified_gmt":"2010-11-11T05:15:05","slug":"field-notes-solarcon-in-hyderabad-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/envirobeat.com\/?p=1439","title":{"rendered":"Field Notes : SolarCon in Hyderabad, India"},"content":{"rendered":"
Nov 9 – 11, Hyderabad, India<\/p>\n
Beyond spicier, more delicious lunches, there were other notable differences between India’s first SolarCon India2009 solar conference, held in association with InterSolar India\/SEMI, and the recent InterSolar\/SEMI San Francisco conference. Whereas in San Francisco three full solar exhibit floors were crowded with large photovoltaic panels from an bewildering number of manufacturers, in Hyderabad the sparser and smaller PV displays from just a few companies didn’t really stand out even on the single floor of exhibitors – perhaps just approaching the smaller number of solar thermal displays in SF. And as for solar thermal in Hyderabad, only a few images on exhibitor display panels were to be seen.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Photon of Hyderabad makes Solar Thermal Systems<\/p>\n
But there were to be found technologies appropriate to the conditions of the region, such as the Diya Solar PV Lantern by HHV Solar, a solar charged alternative to kerosene lighting for rural homes off the grid. In a Climate Change and PV session, panelist Vishnu Reddy presented a statistic making it clear just how necessary such solar powered alternatives are: 100 million homes in India rely on kerosene for lighting, a public health concern.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Why lug around heavy panels to trade shows?<\/p>\n
Scale miniature rural electrification PV model at SolarCon<\/p>\n
Tuesday’s PV & Climate Change panel featured speakers making the case for photovoltaic solar power as a climate change mitigation solution.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n
\n
Shankar Venkateswaran of SustainAbility made several points, including:<\/p>\n
The 2 degrees C threshold is non-negotiable – the results will otherwise be catastrophic.<\/p>\n
GHG concentrations of 400ppm or below give the best chance of avoiding a 2 degree C rise.<\/p>\n
\nVideo:<\/strong> Fielding an audience question, Shankar Venkateswaran makes an insightful point about the lack of existing infrastructures with the long scale time horizon needed to respond appropriately to climate change.<\/p>\n